For Faculty

Faculty cannot teach what they have not practiced

A parallel development path for the educators who will teach the compassion curriculum.

Read this page

AI-narrated audio. The text on this page is the authoritative version.

Essential Understanding

The most consistent failure mode of compassion curricula is faculty who teach the modules without ever having practiced them. Faculty who have not done the inner work cannot teach the inner work. Faculty who have not practiced presence cannot model presence. Faculty wellbeing is not a perk; it is curriculum infrastructure.

Why faculty come first

A program adopting this curriculum should plan for faculty development a full year before student rollout. The reason is not bureaucratic. It is pedagogical.

Faculty who have completed the Foundation Phase before teaching it model what students cannot yet imagine. They have sat with self-compassion practice when it felt uncomfortable. They have noticed their own empathic distress and learned to shift into compassionate concern. They have faced their own edge states.

Students perceive the difference between faculty who have done this work and faculty who are teaching from notes. The curriculum works when faculty embody it.

The faculty cohort experience

Months 1 to 4: Foundation Phase parallel

Faculty cohort completes Modules 1 through 4 themselves, with weekly cohort meetings and a closing retreat.

Empathy-Compassion DistinctionSelf-CompassionCompassion TrainabilityLoving-Kindness Meditation

Months 5 to 8: Application Phase preparation

Faculty study Modules 5 through 9 with attention to teaching method as well as content. Includes peer teaching practice and feedback.

PresenceDeep ListeningPatient as PersonMatteringHope as Clinical Skill

Months 9 to 12: Integration Phase and curriculum design

Faculty study Modules 10 through 12 and design their program-specific implementation. Includes finalizing assessment tools, recruiting standardized patients, and sequencing within existing curriculum.

Cultural HumilityTrauma-Informed CareMoral Resilience

Ongoing faculty practice

After initial cohort completion, sustaining structures keep the practice alive:

Quarterly faculty-only Compassion Rounds

Protected time for faculty to process their own clinical and teaching experiences with the same depth they ask of students. For organizations seeking the full evidence-based program, Schwartz Rounds is a licensed program offered by The Schwartz Center for Compassionate Healthcare, with trained facilitators and a structured format that has demonstrated cumulative wellbeing benefits across 600+ healthcare organizations worldwide.

Annual faculty cohort renewal week

A concentrated return to practice, typically during a break in the academic calendar.

Peer teaching observation cycles

Faculty observe each other teaching the curriculum and provide structured feedback.

Optional advanced training

Narrative medicine certification, MSC teacher training, contemplative pedagogy, or clinical ethics consultation.

For program leadership

What implementation looks like

Timeline: Faculty development begins 12 months before student curriculum launch. The first student cohort starts with Foundation Phase while faculty are completing Integration Phase preparation.

Faculty time: Approximately 4 hours per week during the 12-month development period, plus one 3-day retreat.

Cohort size: 8 to 12 faculty members is optimal. Smaller cohorts lack diversity of perspective; larger cohorts reduce intimacy.

Expected outcomes: Faculty report reduced burnout symptoms, improved teaching satisfaction, and stronger student evaluations. Programs report improved student retention and reduced professionalism concerns.